The Idols of the Cave: Reimagining the Protection of Indigenous Knowledge and Expression
The Canadian Intellectual Property Review (CIPR) is a double-blind peer reviewed journal. It is sent to over 1,800 IPIC members at no cost and can be purchased by non-members for a fee. If you would like to browse the articles included in the CIPR, please consult our database below.
Any author, member or non-member can submit an article for consideration in the CIPR. The CIPR Editorial Board welcomes both short pieces (2,000 to 5,000 words) that may be included in the Notes section of the issue or longer, more in-depth articles. The maximum length of articles, including references, is 20,000 words. Articles may be submitted in French or English. Each article should be accompanied by a 150-word abstract.
All submissions undergo a double-blind review process: the reviewers are not given the authors' identities and the identities of the reviewers are shielded from the authors. Additionally, articles submitted must be original and must not have been previously published elsewhere.
If you would like to submit an article for an upcoming issue of the CIPR please contact admin@ipic.ca.
Canadian Intellectual Property Review
Share
The Idols of the Cave: Reimagining the Protection of Indigenous Knowledge and Expression
Issue: Volume 26 no 1
Author(s): Michael Coyle
Abstract:
This article examines the limitations of existing intellectual property regimes in regulating the use, transmission, and exploitation of Indigenous ideas and forms of expression, and seeks to identify adjustments necessary to create fruitful debate about the possibility of law reform in this area. The author posits that the ineffectiveness of current intellectual property regimes in protecting Indigenous ideas and cultural expressions reflects the historic marginalization of Indigenous peoples’ rights to their traditional lands and resources. Drawing on principles of negotiation theory, this argument challenges the neutrality of current intellectual property rules and examines the differences between Western and Indigenous conceptions of the nature and significance of individual ideas and expression, and the historical and contemporary context that frames Indigenous peoples’ concerns about the protection of cultural knowledge.
