Shining a Light on Geographic Indications in Canada: The Time is Now
The Canadian Intellectual Property Review (CIPR) is a double-blind peer reviewed journal. It is sent to over 1,800 IPIC members at no cost and can be purchased by non-members for a fee. If you would like to browse the articles included in the CIPR, please consult our database below.
Any author, member or non-member can submit an article for consideration in the CIPR. The CIPR Editorial Board welcomes both short pieces (2,000 to 5,000 words) that may be included in the Notes section of the issue or longer, more in-depth articles. The maximum length of articles, including references, is 20,000 words. Articles may be submitted in French or English. Each article should be accompanied by a 150-word abstract.
All submissions undergo a double-blind review process: the reviewers are not given the authors' identities and the identities of the reviewers are shielded from the authors. Additionally, articles submitted must be original and must not have been previously published elsewhere.
If you would like to submit an article for an upcoming issue of the CIPR please contact admin@ipic.ca.
Canadian Intellectual Property Review
Share
Shining a Light on Geographic Indications in Canada: The Time is Now
Issue: Volume 29 no 2
Author(s): Sara Zborovski and Patrick Duke
Abstract:
Geographic indications (“GIs”) are gaining increasing attention globally from governments, legal experts in intellectual property and international law, and the many industries affected by protection of GIs. Yet the legal and business issues relating to GIs remain somewhat opaque to many casual observers. In this paper we hope to shed some light on the historical and contemporary protection of GIs and the impact they can have on industry and consumers.
We begin with a review of the development of GI protection in several international trade agreements negotiated in the 20th century. We then consider the current status of GI protection in Canada, the European Union, and the United States, and discuss and explain the differences between these approaches. We finally discuss two ongoing international trade agreement negotiations which pit Canada in between the EU and US approaches to GI protection, and suggest a path forward that is most suitable to Canadian industry and Canadian consumers.