Patentability of New and Useful Arts in Canada: In Need of New and Useful Doctrine?
The Canadian Intellectual Property Review (CIPR) is a double-blind peer reviewed journal. It is sent to over 1,800 IPIC members at no cost and can be purchased by non-members for a fee. If you would like to browse the articles included in the CIPR, please consult our database below.
Any author, member or non-member can submit an article for consideration in the CIPR. The CIPR Editorial Board welcomes both short pieces (2,000 to 5,000 words) that may be included in the Notes section of the issue or longer, more in-depth articles. The maximum length of articles, including references, is 20,000 words. Articles may be submitted in French or English. Each article should be accompanied by a 150-word abstract.
All submissions undergo a double-blind review process: the reviewers are not given the authors' identities and the identities of the reviewers are shielded from the authors. Additionally, articles submitted must be original and must not have been previously published elsewhere.
If you would like to submit an article for an upcoming issue of the CIPR please contact admin@ipic.ca.
Canadian Intellectual Property Review
Share
Patentability of New and Useful Arts in Canada: In Need of New and Useful Doctrine?
Issue: Volume 27 no 1
Author(s): Nathaniel Lipkus and Marie-Claire Albanese
Abstract:
Canadian courts have recently been invited to grapple with the boundaries of patentable arts in the Amazon and Janssen cases. To correct confusion in the Canadian jurisprudence in this area, we propose a more deliberate juridical approach to subject-matter patentability, emphasizing the policy objectives of innovation, predictability, and consistency of application. This approach is achieved by infusing the term “useful arts” with a historical understanding and by recognizing that doctrines of patent validity such as novelty, utility, and non-obviousness may be better adapted to address patentability concerns. Useful arts are understood as evolving in scope, yet qualitatively distinct from liberal or cultural arts, requiring the practical application of the forces and materials of nature but excluding areas involving an ethical-professional relationship. Developing exclusions from patentability within this rubric will assist patent examiners to issue consistent and predictable decisions in ever-expanding fields of technology.
