Overview of Implications of Three-Dimensional Printing on Canadian Intellectual Property Law
The Canadian Intellectual Property Review (CIPR) is a double-blind peer reviewed journal. It is sent to over 1,800 IPIC members at no cost and can be purchased by non-members for a fee. If you would like to browse the articles included in the CIPR, please consult our database below.
Any author, member or non-member can submit an article for consideration in the CIPR. The CIPR Editorial Board welcomes both short pieces (2,000 to 5,000 words) that may be included in the Notes section of the issue or longer, more in-depth articles. The maximum length of articles, including references, is 20,000 words. Articles may be submitted in French or English. Each article should be accompanied by a 150-word abstract.
All submissions undergo a double-blind review process: the reviewers are not given the authors' identities and the identities of the reviewers are shielded from the authors. Additionally, articles submitted must be original and must not have been previously published elsewhere.
If you would like to submit an article for an upcoming issue of the CIPR please contact admin@ipic.ca.
Canadian Intellectual Property Review
Share
Overview of Implications of Three-Dimensional Printing on Canadian Intellectual Property Law
Issue: Volume 31
Author(s): Teshager W. Dagne
Abstract:
The article provides general overview of diverse questions that consumers’ use of 3D printing technology brings under Canadian intellectual property law. At the backdrop of recent incidents in which the different applications of 3D printing technology were put to light, the discussion explores the intersection of 3D printing technology with
patent law, copyright law and trademark law. The discussion demonstrates the need for legislative and judicial response to prevent the “chilling effect” of excessive demands by intellectual property owners. It concludes with recommendations as to how best to balance the rights of consumers, innovators, and other stakeholders in dealing with competing intellectual property interests involving 3D printing.
