Licence and Assignment Arrangements of Patents: Effective or Ineffective in Blocking Parallel Imports of Patented Products—Thoughts of Euro-Excellence v Kraft
The Canadian Intellectual Property Review (CIPR) is a double-blind peer reviewed journal. It is sent to over 1,800 IPIC members at no cost and can be purchased by non-members for a fee. If you would like to browse the articles included in the CIPR, please consult our database below.
Any author, member or non-member can submit an article for consideration in the CIPR. The CIPR Editorial Board welcomes both short pieces (2,000 to 5,000 words) that may be included in the Notes section of the issue or longer, more in-depth articles. The maximum length of articles, including references, is 20,000 words. Articles may be submitted in French or English. Each article should be accompanied by a 150-word abstract.
All submissions undergo a double-blind review process: the reviewers are not given the authors' identities and the identities of the reviewers are shielded from the authors. Additionally, articles submitted must be original and must not have been previously published elsewhere.
If you would like to submit an article for an upcoming issue of the CIPR please contact admin@ipic.ca.
Canadian Intellectual Property Review
Share
Licence and Assignment Arrangements of Patents: Effective or Ineffective in Blocking Parallel Imports of Patented Products—Thoughts of Euro-Excellence v Kraft
Issue: Volume 36
Author(s): Shuji Sumi
Abstract:
Parallel imports of products protected by intellectual property rights are always controversial. In Euro-Excellence Inc v Kraft Canada Inc, the Supreme Court of Canada prevented the exclusive licensee of the Canadian copyright from blocking parallel imports of copyrighted products, but suggested that the assignee of the copyright could have blocked parallel imports. Notably, even though the exclusive licensee was a subsidiary of the copyright owner, the parent–subsidiary relationship was not an issue for parallel imports. The same situations that were involved in Euro-Excellence v Kraft may arise in respect of other kinds of intellectual property rights. Because the Supreme Court has not dealt, in particular, with parallel imports of patented products, it is an open question whether such imports of patented products can be blocked. One question that arises regarding parallel imports of patented products is whether the importation of foreign-sold patented products infringes on the Canadian patent. To answer this question, purchasers’ rights to patented products must be clarified. This article discusses purchasers’ rights to patented products in Canada with reference to relevant Canadian and UK jurisprudence. Furthermore, taking into consideration purchasers’ rights, this article discusses whether parallel imports of patented products can be blocked in various scenarios. Specifically, it discusses whether licence and assignment arrangements of Canadian or foreign patents are effective in blocking parallel imports of patented products. This article also discusses whether Canadian subsidiaries can block parallel imports into Canada and whether establishing foreign subsidiaries as licensees or assignees for the marketing of patented products in the foreign countries is an effective strategy in blocking parallel imports of patented products.
