Client Conflict Rules and Intellectual Property Practice in Canada
The Canadian Intellectual Property Review (CIPR) is a double-blind peer reviewed journal. It is sent to over 1,800 IPIC members at no cost and can be purchased by non-members for a fee. If you would like to browse the articles included in the CIPR, please consult our database below.
Any author, member or non-member can submit an article for consideration in the CIPR. The CIPR Editorial Board welcomes both short pieces (2,000 to 5,000 words) that may be included in the Notes section of the issue or longer, more in-depth articles. The maximum length of articles, including references, is 20,000 words. Articles may be submitted in French or English. Each article should be accompanied by a 150-word abstract.
All submissions undergo a double-blind review process: the reviewers are not given the authors' identities and the identities of the reviewers are shielded from the authors. Additionally, articles submitted must be original and must not have been previously published elsewhere.
If you would like to submit an article for an upcoming issue of the CIPR please contact admin@ipic.ca.
Canadian Intellectual Property Review
Share
Client Conflict Rules and Intellectual Property Practice in Canada
Issue: Volume 24 no 2
Author(s): Kevin L. LaRoche and Steven Kennedy
Abstract:
Lawyers have a duty to avoid conflicts of interest. Although the Canadian Bar Association and provincial law societies have promulgated codes of ethics relating to conflicts, the rules of more immediate interest are those set by the courts. The rules vary depending on the relationship between the lawyer and the client. As a result, they have special implications for intellectual property practice: maintenance files remain dormant yet still active for decades; “associate” prosecution files involve a third-party intermediary between the lawyer and client; and the conflict rules pertaining to “lawyers” may apply differently to patent and trade-mark agents. This article explores the courts’ conflict rules as they pertain to various aspects of intellectual property practice.
